…the next pick to the people who saw you pick the “winner”. Now half of those people see one team, the other half see you pick the other team, and whoever saw you pick the winner thinks you’ve got a 100% accuracy rate over two games. You could do that for a while and then offer to sell your pick for the Superbowl. Starting with a big enough group in the beginning, this might be really lucrative.

But is it legal?

    • bane_killgrind@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      After your shit gets raided and there’s evidence that you sent out two sets of information to different people… Yeah that’s extremely probable.

      You don’t understand how much of an electronic trail mass mailing would leave. If your mark and a burned mark were on the same email provider, a warrant would uncover this extremely simple scam.

      • schmidtster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I understand completely, you would need a reason to start investigating them to begin with, and that’s pretty easy to claim after, but during how would you know frauds happening…?

        • bane_killgrind@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You aren’t making much sense. You are asking how people would find out they are being defrauded before they are defrauded.

    • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Would the emails you sent to about a million people be enough to prove intent?

      This is the oldest scam in the book.

      Also, the question is, is it legal. Not whether you are likely to get convicted for it.

      The answer to the questions btw are no, and yes. These types of fraud cases are dead easy to prove and LE secures convictions all the friggin time.

    • zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, this lemmy post would be exhibit #1 - but even without it it is not at all difficult to establish intent to deceive from just the actions OP is suggesting and nothing more. Sometimes intent is the easy part.

        • hope@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          One of the people emailed could potentially report the suspicious behavior, especially if one gets burned by the made up sports advice.

    • AnonTwo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Given someone found it has an official name (Psychic Sports Picks Trick) i’m sure it’s not even close to impossible.

      It should be mentioned though that it sounds like you’d need a massive pool of people for it to actually work.

    • Thisfox@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Pretty easy if you keep narrowing your email pool when people see you pick a loser.

        • Thisfox@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          …When you get investigated for fraud? Likely when they check your outgoing. But also by communicating with other targets of your fraudulent service. I doubt you will send 80 million emails manually, but go right ahead and test that.

          • schmidtster@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            How would you know fraud is happening to start a lawsuit…?

            You seem to be putting facts together after the fact.

            • admiralteal@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              …what do you think is going on here, in this thread?

              It’s talking about taking peoples’ money based on your (fraudulent) ability to predict the outcome. There will be victims in the form of the people whose money was taken. Some of those people will see that the result didn’t match. The fraud will be evident to the defrauded victims.

            • digdug@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The original question was whether it was legal, not whether they could get away with it. If they did get caught, there is a very high likelihood they could be convicted of fraud.