No it is not. That’s only an answer if one thinks that every sources bias is as bad as any other, which was rejected earlier as “outrages strawman”. Under the assumption that sources can be more or less biased, it is worth questioning the bias and the statement “there’s no such thing as a source with no bias” is a moot point.
Damnit you are dense. I will not explain a third time that this is completely irrelevant. This is getting to levels of “your argument is invalid because you made spelling mistake”… Don’t know how .ml got back into my feed, but back in the blocklist it goes.
No it is not. That’s only an answer if one thinks that every sources bias is as bad as any other, which was rejected earlier as “outrages strawman”. Under the assumption that sources can be more or less biased, it is worth questioning the bias and the statement “there’s no such thing as a source with no bias” is a moot point.
Mate, the person literally said “Either the sources are biased or not”. Fuck off with your “outrageous strawman” nonsense.
Damnit you are dense. I will not explain a third time that this is completely irrelevant. This is getting to levels of “your argument is invalid because you made spelling mistake”… Don’t know how .ml got back into my feed, but back in the blocklist it goes.