Our latest blog post is aimed at people who ‘get it’ about online privacy, but who struggle to convince friends and family to take it seriously. We hope it helps!

  • calmblue75@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Even if its one person, you would have to start somewhere. Maybe they have your data from the last 24 years, as per your example. If you cut off now, five years later, they still have only 24 years of your data. They won’t have the last five year’s data, which would be crucial for them.

    • kindred@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      That doesn’t address the other two bullet points.

      It’s like tracking an animal moving in tall grass. You don’t need to be able to see the animal directly to tell where it is.

      If I can’t disappear completely, there’s enough data points around me that a useful silhouette can be reconstructed from all the surrounding data.

      What’s the point?

      • SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 hours ago

        The article addresses this. Data must be fresh to be valuable. Yes old data can be useful, but can it be sold? That’s the main vulnerability to surveillance capitalism that hiding exploits.