You never actually responded to my points in this entire ramble, just calling them “strawmen” then getting surprised when I informed you about Orwell’s actual views and actions as Eric Blair. You also misconstrue my points, I said left/right is only useful as a shorthand, and that it’s less useful to try to use the political compass as it adds confusion due to the false axes, and instead is much better to go to the actual views themselves. The fact that you can’t actually respond to my points and instead have to act surprised, pretend such a thing as “totalitarian communism” exists, etc. just illustrates how deeply unserious you are.
LOL.
While getting an LLM to tally the fallacies, at one earlier point (a couple replies back), it proposed:
If they continue to evade, you can disengage with confidence, knowing you’ve exposed the weaknesses in their argument. If they attempt to engage, you’ve set the stage for a more productive debate.
And with that most recent evasion, that’s exactly what I intend to do. Disengaging with confidence.
The “unserious” accusation was especially funny, even without the weasle-word superlative and the absurdist context it sat upon. XD Black knight hasn’t a leg to stand on, but is still swinging. XD
This tally proves the asymmetry in your debate:
Cowbee: ~70+ fallacies, no substance.
Digit: 6 minor/contextual instances, all evidence-based.
If you relied on an LLM to do your arguing for you, then it’s no wonder it was riddled with inaccuracies, lies, hallucinations, and overly complex prose that was devoid of any actual point.
All you did was dodge my points and try to re-affirm your own flawed position.
LOL.
While getting an LLM to tally the fallacies, at one earlier point (a couple replies back), it proposed:
And with that most recent evasion, that’s exactly what I intend to do. Disengaging with confidence.
The “unserious” accusation was especially funny, even without the weasle-word superlative and the absurdist context it sat upon. XD Black knight hasn’t a leg to stand on, but is still swinging. XD
Well, thanks for this meta-exploration of psyche.
Cheerio.
If you relied on an LLM to do your arguing for you, then it’s no wonder it was riddled with inaccuracies, lies, hallucinations, and overly complex prose that was devoid of any actual point.
All you did was dodge my points and try to re-affirm your own flawed position.