• lime!@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 days ago

    vista was also a good system. the market just tried to push it on people with hardware which was not up to the task. when 7 released, compatible hardware was already in place.

    • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 days ago

      Not just hardware, drivers. Driver support was abysmal. On a decent hdd with updated drivers vista was fine.

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 days ago

        yeah because driver were previously allowed to do whatever the hell they wanted with the system and vista introduced a baselevel of security.

        the rollout was a mess, the os really wasn’t. which is a surprise considering the development story.

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      I’ll also put Vista’s bad reputation down to that it was the first version with UAC, which if I recall was set too sensitive, combined with the fact that it was something new and weird for most Windows users at the time and the fact that a lot of software didn’t have time to catch up to add proper compability with the system.

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 days ago

        it’s not that it was too sensitive, it was that windows was previously a lawless land where every application had full access to the entire system. you’re bound to get some compatibility issues from that.