• RonSijm@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Pretty cool. I tried to google it, and I couldn’t actually find the source for it. Just a bunch of articles about it and a reddit thread.

    I’m curious what it’s written in

  • mormund@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Not to be a hater, but why? (Referring to the two screens, not the open source part)

    • TheV2@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Some books are written or laid out with two pages in mind. What this specific e-reader unfortunately doesn’t solve is the problem with double page spreads in manga (although digital versions, at least those I use, don’t spread them on two pages anyway).

      • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Also I could see it being useful if you can “pin” some pages on one side, especially if you need to compare multiple documents on the fly.

    • HeartyOfGlass@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I’m a huge fan of this idea. Having a light clamshell device for reading means the formatting would be (should be, might be) closer to that of a physical book. With most books I don’t think that matters, but there are tons where the author plays with page formatting & typography and it rarely comes off well in a single-screen ereader.

      Additionally - clamshell means built-in screen protection. I’ve never liked those stick-on 3rd party screen protector sheets, and a clamshell design is going to do a better job of protecting the screen anyway. Something like this you can snap it closed and chuck it in a bag without worrying.

      • Deebster@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        I just checked the weight: it’s 300g which is a little heavier than my Kobo with case (273g) and a ~400 page paperback (213g). That’s lighter than I expected given that it’s basically two readers stuck together including two batteries.

        However, I think the kind of media that would benefit from the original page layout would also need a higher resolution, and perhaps colour.

        • Libb@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          21 hours ago

          However, I think the kind of media that would benefit from the original page layout would also need a higher resolution, and perhaps colour.

          Indeed. Resolution will probably need to be higher in that regard. For books (not comics or art books), color should not be that important.

          That being said, the issue of (not) owning and (not) controlling our ebooks is the reason why I stopped reading & purchasing them a few years ago (despite being heavy into those since the early 00s). So, I’m very much interested in that project :)

    • hash@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Yeah, I also don’t really see the appeal of a two screen format. Currently use a boox palma 2 phone sized reader. I keep my font size pretty large but don’t really find needing to turn the page a bit more a burden.

    • poVoq@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Probably much cheaper and easier to get, while allowing for a reasonably large total screen size.

  • yaroto98@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    Too bad the front isn’t a screen too. It would be pretty awesome to open a book and automatically slave the front screen to the book’s cover.

    Also strange that the dev didn’t enable wifi. That’s just strange. It’s running an esp32, it has a wifi chip and getting it to connect is incredibly easy.

    • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Probably don’t want the burden of keeping the firmware up-to-date with the latest security fixes, and miminizes the risk of a security exploit if that door isn’t opened.

      • HeartyOfGlass@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        I haven’t. More than anything I’m supporting the idea of something like this. Little clamshell ereader that’s not tied to a company? Hell yeah. Version 0.01 here might not be what I’m lusting after, but it’s that much closer to Version 2.0.

        • FunctionallyLiterate@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          I guess I’m too much of a “if you’re gonna do something, then do it right the first time” kinda person. I’ve learned from (too much) experience that compromises on quality too often just wind up being wasted money.

          • Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            14 hours ago

            Well the problem here is that there isn’t a company that have money and so they can’t do a very good product, when the project will gain money they can do a V2 with better specs and in general they will know better how build it, this prosuct is pre-launch and in general you have to see those as betas not a end product.

            Also, e-ink displays cost more than my balls

          • poVoq@slrpnk.netOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Pine64 tried that with their PineNote, which hardware wise seems excellent. But it ended up being so expensive that sales were abmyssal and subsequently there was also little developer take up and general community excitement to make something cool out of it on the software side.

            • FunctionallyLiterate@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 hours ago

              Yeah, that’s pretty common. Final cost will always matter, but the product still has to be worth it. Many companies have a history of not making the best balance calls, however.

              One thing I’ve learned never to scrimp too much on, however, is anything i directly interact with. Displays are especially important for the health of your eyes - especially with as much time as most people spend looking at them nowadays. As such, I can’t really get behind this product.

          • HeartyOfGlass@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            I can dig that. Just like how I have no intention of building / buying this model, but the progress towards something I’ve been pining for is exciting.

      • RonSijm@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        If it’s “open source hardware” wouldn’t it be pretty easy to put it different screens?

        Like it also only had a 2 GB SD card… I’d guess most people would upgrade that