ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · edit-21 day agoPOV: You're a programmerlemmy.worldimagemessage-square76fedilinkarrow-up1800arrow-down116
arrow-up1784arrow-down1imagePOV: You're a programmerlemmy.worldZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · edit-21 day agomessage-square76fedilink
minus-squarejenesaisquoi@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·17 hours agoserde has entered the chat
minus-squarebalsoft@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 hours agoPersonally I’m more partial to nom. Serde is quite verbose and complex for a parser.
minus-squarefuck_u_spez_in_particular@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·15 hours agoFrom Scratch (as much as I like Rust, it’s very likely more verbose from scratch). Haskell is perfect for these kinds of things.
minus-squarejenesaisquoi@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·14 hours agoI will concede that implementing the first version in Haskell would be better. Mostly so that we can then fulfil the meme of reimplementing it Rust!
serde has entered the chat
Personally I’m more partial to nom. Serde is quite verbose and complex for a parser.
From Scratch (as much as I like Rust, it’s very likely more verbose from scratch). Haskell is perfect for these kinds of things.
I will concede that implementing the first version in Haskell would be better.
Mostly so that we can then fulfil the meme of reimplementing it Rust!