Today’s most advanced AI models have many flaws, but decades from now, they will be recognized as the first true examples of artificial general intelligence.
It is if you redefine AGI to mean the thing that’s already here, although to get away with that it helps if at the same time you overestimate what LLMs are capable of doing.
No it’s not.
It is if you redefine AGI to mean the thing that’s already here, although to get away with that it helps if at the same time you overestimate what LLMs are capable of doing.
On the whole, I think I prefer “we figured out how to do this, so it’s not actually AI” over crappy thinkpieces like this.
lol calling it 1% of the way to AGI is probably delusionally generous. It has effectively nothing in common with it.
I am reminded of the saying: climbing a mountain is not 1% of the way to outer space