• chuckleslord@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    9 个月前

    Yeah, the joke is that every company is trying to ram LLMs and Agentic LLMs into everything without thinking about what they’re trying to accomplish. Like the trend with blockchain a decade ago.

    Yours is a valid use case for ai. That’s why it doesn’t fit the meme.

    • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      9 个月前

      But the meme is making the more extreme claim that no uses exist, so any counterexamples mean it’s untrue. Not the best way of criticizing companies that don’t know or care what a technology is good for imo.

      • RobertoOberto@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        9 个月前

        the meme is making the more extreme claim that no uses exist

        Only if you take it literally instead of as a joke that is exaggerating for comedic effect.

        • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          9 个月前

          That’s difficult when there are lots of people who will say that and be serious about it. No way to know if it’s hyperbole.

      • Jankatarch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 个月前

        “AI” is a general term. Tech companies use “AI” more than chatbot so people can’t talk about it as easily.

        You know this and are just acting dumb to stand out with your contrarianism.

        Government defunding NIH blood cancer research while building chatbot anime-girlfriend datahouses was in fact a bad thing, stop trying to act quirky and unique.

    • nednobbins@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 个月前

      Thanks. That sounds more like a joke aimed at non-programmers about people who think they’re programmers. If I’m willing to ignore all the valid use cases of AI, I guess it might be funny to assume that none exist.