I disagree with the first part of your statement. Ethics and moral philosophy are why I have this worldview. The theoretical, academic and intellectual are how we improve that connection.
Historically, (like before the 1900s) only the elite COULD afford to be academic. In modern times, the rise of public education has vastly increased the quality of life amongst the non-elite.
Additionally, the modern elite are almost exclusively anti-intellectual. There is no professor in existence who would want their knowledge to be kept to themselves, there is no writer who wishes their works shared, for them to go unpublished.
The modern elite are the anti-everything that keep us together.
I disagree with the first part of your statement. Ethics and moral philosophy are why I have this worldview. The theoretical, academic and intellectual are how we improve that connection.
Historically, (like before the 1900s) only the elite COULD afford to be academic. In modern times, the rise of public education has vastly increased the quality of life amongst the non-elite.
Additionally, the modern elite are almost exclusively anti-intellectual. There is no professor in existence who would want their knowledge to be kept to themselves, there is no writer who wishes their works shared, for them to go unpublished.
The modern elite are the anti-everything that keep us together.