You don’t need git alternatives. git has nothing to do with fascistsoft. Please don’t confuse a repo hosting service with the (FOSS) tools used thereon.
The comment claimed “alternative to GitHub”. I pointed out that it’s an alternative for only a subset of use cases/projects. Without that clarification, someone may explore or follow through and be disappointed.
You don’t need git alternatives. git has nothing to do with fascistsoft. Please don’t confuse a repo hosting service with the (FOSS) tools used thereon.
Alternative for github: codeberg.org
only for
publicFOSSPartially true, yes, that is a downside: codeberg currently does not allow non-free licenses. But no, a repository does not have to be public.
Why is that a bad thing ?
It is not a bad thing.
The comment claimed “alternative to GitHub”. I pointed out that it’s an alternative for only a subset of use cases/projects. Without that clarification, someone may explore or follow through and be disappointed.