Another lawsuit centered around copyright infringement ends in success for Nintendo. The company claimed that Ryan Daly ran the Modded Hardware storefront and sold the Mig Switch. Previously, Nintendo shut down the Yuzu emulator developer Tropic Haze and websites hosting ROM files.
In the same way a camera can create pirated copies of famous paintings from museums
It’s only piracy if you distribute it, otherwise it’s just format shifting.
I use the word “archiving” because it’s a universally understood concept that even survives translation.
Yes, but format shifting is a legally defined term in the US that originated when VCRs came onto the scene.
fun fact, Mr. Rogers testified at the Supreme Court to save format shifting, in a landmark copyright case:
the Court agreed with Mr. Rogers and cited him in the majority Opinion.
He’d be unimaginably sad to see the world today.
Mr. Rogers was better than we deserved.
Exactly. The author seems biased towards Nintendo here.
People don’t even realize anymore they’ve adopted corpo speach. They’re getting told it’s “professional”, “neutral” and all that jazz. Especially the “neutrality” bullshit, perfect breeding ground for manipulators to plant nonsense. And we all know all those corpos perfected the art of mass manipulation to the point they employ whole departments to do it and pay politicians to dance by their fiddle.
Notebookcheck.net tries to report “neutral”, and it fucking shows.
You’re right, and I don’t want to criticize, but most museums do actually have rules banning photography.
Every museum I went to allowed photography with flash turned off.
This included every major museum in NYC, the Lourve in Paris, and Picasso’s Museum in Barcelona.
at a museum in the US, a security guard yelled at me for taking a photo of a Miró painting. he pointed to a sign saying that to respect the owner’s copyright, photography was strictly forbidden.
pretty sure I had the legal right to take the photo, but that they had the legal right to trespass me if I kept doing it. :/
Leaves a bitter taste in the mouth. You could probably find a better resolution copy of the painting online anyway.
I’ve been to multiple museums in Japan (which is somewhat relevant because Nintendo is Japanese) that either flat out ban all photography (e.g. Ghibli Museum, Aomori Museum of Modern Art) or have some exhibits that you’re not allowed to take pictures of (e.g. Tokyo National Museum). One exhibit I wanted to take a picture of had a “no photography” sticker on it, but it was on the opposite side from where I approached so I didn’t see it, causing staff to run up to me when I pulled out my phone to point out the sign.
I’ve also heard from other tourists that “no photos” seems to be rather common there.
Btw, I’m not at all saying that they’re justified at all, just saying that there are indeed places that forbid photos for copyright reasons. In my opinion, no photo would ever match seeing the exhibits in person so it is entirely pointless to ban them. Even professional, official scans of pieces don’t come close.
Current Japan is the literal definition of a corporate hellscape. The only place that is more controlled by cabals is South Korea. They don’t even view Cabal as a negative term there (officially, I recognize that the citizenry are not that stupid).
I thought of that after I posted, and I also saw somebody commented something similar on the article itself.