balderdash@lemmy.zip to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2 years agoMoralitylemmy.zipimagemessage-square54fedilinkarrow-up1259arrow-down134
arrow-up1225arrow-down1imageMoralitylemmy.zipbalderdash@lemmy.zip to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2 years agomessage-square54fedilink
minus-squareneptune@dmv.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·2 years agoThis sounds like Goedels theorem. How could a philosophy be consistent and have an opinion about every moral topic?
minus-squareAnamnesis@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 years agoI’m not sure morality would have the same problems with recursion that math has.
minus-squareneptune@dmv.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·2 years agoI’m not sure it’s the SAME but if there were a system of created ethics that were able to speak to everything and do so consistently… Wouldn’t we know?
minus-squareHappyRedditRefugee@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoYooo. You are onto something here.
This sounds like Goedels theorem. How could a philosophy be consistent and have an opinion about every moral topic?
I’m not sure morality would have the same problems with recursion that math has.
I’m not sure it’s the SAME but if there were a system of created ethics that were able to speak to everything and do so consistently… Wouldn’t we know?
Yooo. You are onto something here.