• CluckN@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    7 days ago

    I like it. If the game is unplayable to everyone then cheaters can’t get in.

    • Sal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      Secure Boot is literally one toggle in the BIOS what are you talking about 😭

      • NakedGardenGnome@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        On my linux gaming install it ain’t, its not only quite hard to set up, the current certificates which can be used are said to expire in… 2026? I remember reading that somewhere on here.

        • Sal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Windows is always updating its Secure Boot protocols so it makes sense.

  • Sal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    Honestly this isn’t a problem, since it’s simply looking at the checks Secure Boot makes when starting. The issue is still the deep root access. Altho, both BF6 and Cod’s anti-cheat only run when the game is on, so it’s uhh, less bad than something like Riot Vanguard.

    Still terrible, tho.

    • alk@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yeah, if the anticheat is ever compromised, I don’t think it’s going to patiently wait until you’re done playing to fuck up your day. So I don’t really see a difference between always-on and sometimes-on kernel anti cheat.

      • Sal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Yeah I agree they’re both terrible in their own regards, but cheating has become such a profitable industry that I don’t see anything short of government regulations or extremely aggressive anti-cheat solving it. And also, if a group of hackers managed to compromise an anti-cheat, I’m sure there would be terrible consequences for them. They’d paint a target on their backs and companies affected would go to the ends of the earth to make sure they got prosecuted. I think that’s the reason they haven’t tried yet, and just try to bypass it with quiet, advanced stuff that has no media attention. The worst thing a hacker can do is attract attention to themselves.