fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 个月前Water Snekmander.xyzimagemessage-square113fedilinkarrow-up1673arrow-down15
arrow-up1668arrow-down1imageWater Snekmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 个月前message-square113fedilink
minus-squareCodpiece@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·2 个月前+1 for pedantry. I’ve edited my comment to add an Oxford comma, because I know everyone likes those.
minus-squareteft@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·edit-22 个月前That’s not an Oxford comma. Oxford commas (also known as serial commas) are for lists that contain more than three terms. You should just replace the “and waves” with “but there are waves” or something like that.
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 个月前Now it’s worse. “Waves and no road” is what you’re looking for.
No, there were probably waves.
+1 for pedantry.
I’ve edited my comment to add an Oxford comma, because I know everyone likes those.
That’s not an Oxford comma. Oxford commas (also known as serial commas) are for lists that contain more than three terms.
You should just replace the “and waves” with “but there are waves” or something like that.
“waves and no road”
Now it’s worse.
“Waves and no road” is what you’re looking for.