maris@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 3 days agoGambling with Lainlemmy.worldimagemessage-square33fedilinkarrow-up1350arrow-down111
arrow-up1339arrow-down1imageGambling with Lainlemmy.worldmaris@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 3 days agomessage-square33fedilink
minus-squarePtsf@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·3 days agoAre you sure? From what I can tell there’s a 5 in 6 chance of catastrophic failure.
minus-squareLucy :3@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up14·3 days agoFirst of all, 1 in n. Second, 0…6 has amount 7 (len(0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) == 7), so therefore 1/7. Also,
minus-squarePtsf@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·3 days agoFair, I was trying to be cheeky and here you are shutting me up with a compiler level “nope”. Take your +1.
Are you sure? From what I can tell there’s a 5 in 6 chance of catastrophic failure.
First of all, 1 in n. Second, 0…6 has amount 7 (len(0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) == 7), so therefore 1/7.
Also,
Fair, I was trying to be cheeky and here you are shutting me up with a compiler level “nope”. Take your +1.