• Melody Fwygon@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    18 days ago

    Alpha channels are critical. The ability to have images have transparency in them is much more useful than you believe it is. Many end users have a need for it, more than they know they do; so this argument really isn’t doing much for your stance supporting PNG. Similarly PNG has supported alpha channels for quite a while.

    • Powderhorn@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      18 days ago

      For production, yes. What percentage of images produced are for production, though? I know damn well how important alpha channels are, but for posting something on social media, which is orders of magnitude more output than image creation within the context of a larger presentation, no one cares.

      The vast majority of people aren’t graphic artists. That you and I know what alpha channels are has no bearing on daily use by the masses.

        • Powderhorn@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 days ago

          If you know why you need alpha channels, of course you’re going to save in an appropriate format. But most casual users aren’t going to care. They took a picture of their breakfast or dog and just want to upload now. I’m not arguing PNGs serve no purpose; I’m arguing that most people aren’t Web or app designers. They don’t care whether it’s lossy or lossless, let alone about transparency.