I am not from the US. Had my close relative fight with cancer. If not for the government which sponsored it almost fully, excluding a couple of procedures like PET, it would cost our family a lot. Just for the scale: pial for one infusion of one out of three drugs would cost us $8k and my relative would’ve needed 16 infusions.

  • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    14 hours ago

    are you asking how we treat, or what do we pay?

    many people with cancer in the u.s. go the cheapest routes for treatment because some are incredibly expensive. hospitals are only required to ‘stabilize’. they are not mandated to cure. poorer people have worse outcomes as they cant afford the best treatments.

    • vivalapivo@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      14 hours ago

      are you asking how we treat, or what do we pay?

      Both actually.

      cheapest…they are not mandated to cure

      So even the stabilization requires paying the bill? Isn’t it like an emergency medicine where doing nothing just kills?

      • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        13 hours ago

        yes, there is no free healthcare.

        those with the lowest incomes qualify for government assistance in the form of medicare/medicaid but this is fairly minimal and specifically excludes most novel treatments. our republicans/conservatives continually find ways to reduce this funding. they are truly awful human beings despite being the ‘pro life’, ‘pro god’ block of our electorate.

        the united states sucks donkey balls for poor people considering its wealthy status otherwise. all that money is at the top, and its getting worse.

          • hallettj@leminal.space
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Hospitals are required to provide emergency treatment - what we call ED or ER visits - regardless of ability to pay. Patients are expected to pay for that treatment. It’s just that the hospital isn’t supposed to deny treatment based on whether they think patients will or won’t pay the bill. This is getting-stabilized treatment.

            This is an important point in arguing for universal healthcare: if people can’t afford treatment, they’re more likely to go to the ED where they won’t be turned away. ED visits tend to cost more than non-emergency, so that drives costs up.