CodyIT@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 3 days agothe beautiful codeprogramming.devimagemessage-square217fedilinkarrow-up12.04Karrow-down111
arrow-up12.03Karrow-down1imagethe beautiful codeprogramming.devCodyIT@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 3 days agomessage-square217fedilink
minus-squareDaPorkchop_@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up9·2 days agoOkay, you can’t just drop that bombshell without elaborating. What sort of bug could exist in a program which contains a single return instruction?!?
minus-squareAmberskin@europe.publinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 days agoIt didn’t clear the return code. In mainframe jobs, successful executions are expected to return zero (in the machine R15 register). So in this case fixing the bug required to add an instruction instead of removing one.
Okay, you can’t just drop that bombshell without elaborating. What sort of bug could exist in a program which contains a single return instruction?!?
It didn’t clear the return code. In mainframe jobs, successful executions are expected to return zero (in the machine R15 register).
So in this case fixing the bug required to add an instruction instead of removing one.