A 7/10 is basically a complete failure, so why didn’t reviewers take my feelings into account before publishing their scores?

    • gk99@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      it really was just “another Saints Row game” but with better characters.

      This is sarcasm, right? If it were even close to that we all would’ve loved it. To me, it felt like the worst parts of later SR games mashed up with a desperate attempt to replicate Watch_Dogs 2’s vibe. I don’t play Saints Row to play as a dude trying to pay off their student loans while fighting “gangs” that have access to random bullshit technology like neon batons that spin real fast and deflect bullets. That’s the type of stuff that should’ve stayed in Agents of Mayhem with its far less grounded setting.

    • • milan •@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      My computer is providing a pretty neat little metaphor for how I expect those talks will go at a lot of outlets. Will there be room for two massive RPGs? Will some opt to make room for Starfield while others go for Baldur’s Gate 3? Will Tears of the Kingdom take up the space they otherwise would have occupied? Or will another game that hasn’t been released yet plant its flag in the proverbial hard drive?

      Way to deliberately miss the point.