• invalidusernamelol [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The conversation was you linking a Wikipedia article, I was at least hoping you’d link like a book or something. Like we could have a discussion if you were trying to argue against authoritarianiam as defined by say Bakunin or some other anarchist thinker.

      Then I could respond with On Authority which argues that authority is a natural consequence of any organization and calling something authoritarian just means you’re saying that it’s a system that is able to successfully reproduce itself.

      You could also try to link “authoritarianism” to fascism, but again that is pointless because there’s already a term for fascism, which is Fascism.

    • SeaJ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      You may as well talk to a wall. It would be about as useful although probably less frustrating.

          • Egon [they/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you would reread the thread you’d notice it begins with the hexbear user making a simple request, which the user could not fulfill. Any further questions in the discussion were met with derision, which is when the bad-faith behaviour was reciprocrated by the hexbear user. Please do better and hold yourself to at least half the standard you expect of others