Samsy@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · edit-21 year ago2023-08-09.jpglemmy.mlimagemessage-square407fedilinkarrow-up12.03Karrow-down1151
arrow-up11.88Karrow-down1image2023-08-09.jpglemmy.mlSamsy@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · edit-21 year agomessage-square407fedilink
minus-squareint@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up71·edit-21 year agoThe fact that “YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM” displays from set to subset is visually satisfying to me. I use the format everywhere.
minus-squarepythonoob@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up24·1 year agoI use it everywhere too. Screw the naysayers
minus-squarepastermil@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up12·1 year agoNot only visually satisfying, but also logically sound
minus-squarepomodoro_longbreak@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up10·1 year agoHell I use it in my diary. It just works
minus-squareharuki@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoNot on paper documents though. Here in Europe I have to write dd-mm-yyyy.
minus-squareElHexo [comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·1 year agoIf you’re writing on paper, 10 August 2023 is superior.
The fact that “YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM” displays from set to subset is visually satisfying to me. I use the format everywhere.
I use it everywhere too. Screw the naysayers
Not only visually satisfying, but also logically sound
Hell I use it in my diary. It just works
I wish we this for work.
Not on paper documents though. Here in Europe I have to write dd-mm-yyyy.
If you’re writing on paper, 10 August 2023 is superior.