How about ANY FINITE SEQUENCE AT ALL?

    • Urist@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      They should look up the classic example of rationals in the real numbers. Their statement could hardly be more wrong.

        • Urist@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I most assuredly am talking about your false statement regarding density.

            • Urist@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              2 days ago

              Weird to flex when you have nothing to show off. Let me show you how you do it, buddy: I am a mathematician. Infinity, density and cardinality of sets are not mysterious to me because I read a lot of books. If you read a few then you might discover your very cool comment above was actually not so cool and true.

              • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                It is true in the probability problem we talked about, and it’s not a statement, it’s not a thesis, it’s an attempt at conversation between emotionally stable adults but it is really okay to be autistic just don’t make fights over it because it’s no big deal for anyone else that all statements are perfect but that they get meaning across

                • Urist@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  24 hours ago

                  Damn, you really do suck more as a person than you do at math.