UhBell@lemmy.world to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoThe best way to sort postslemmy.worldimagemessage-square105fedilinkarrow-up11.6Karrow-down125
arrow-up11.58Karrow-down1imageThe best way to sort postslemmy.worldUhBell@lemmy.world to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square105fedilink
minus-squarelolcatnip@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13arrow-down1·1 year agoI assume you’re just joking, but does that feature even exist in any Lemmy clients? Seems like the number of servers that don’t allow downvotes would make it useless anyway.
minus-squareGrammaton Cleric@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up17·1 year agoDrama addicts are gonna have to find another teat upon which to suckle.
minus-squareBlack_Gulaman@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoThey could always create their own vicious cycle.
minus-squareSeedyOne@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoThis is something that could be added to a client some day even if it won’t work on some instances. I’d use it on occasion.
minus-squareNato Boram@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoIt wouldn’t work on posts with more than 50 comments, unfortunately. That’s something the back-end has to offer. … unless the client decides to proxy all calls and make its own aggregate…
minus-squareAppoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·1 year agoSync user: So far sync is unable to
I assume you’re just joking, but does that feature even exist in any Lemmy clients? Seems like the number of servers that don’t allow downvotes would make it useless anyway.
Drama addicts are gonna have to find another teat upon which to suckle.
They could always create their own vicious cycle.
This is something that could be added to a client some day even if it won’t work on some instances. I’d use it on occasion.
It wouldn’t work on posts with more than 50 comments, unfortunately. That’s something the back-end has to offer.
… unless the client decides to proxy all calls and make its own aggregate…
Sync user: So far sync is unable to