• jarfil@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The current lever is “you get closed unless… you follow these invasive rules we’ve come up with, which we’re forcing testing organizations to follow, and you’re free to do business with whatever company you want… oh, Google turns out to be the cheapest one following those rules? Whatever.”

    The browser attestation is a way for Google to keep offering an even cheaper way to comply with those invasive rules.

    • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Browser attestation is a massive, unconditionally unforgivable invasion of privacy, for the exclusive purpose of strengthening Google’s monopoly on the internet.

      There’s no possible scenario you could contrive where there’s even .00000001% good faith mixed in with the bad, because if even that little was there, you would never consider implementing it.

      • jarfil@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        massive, unconditionally unforgivable invasion of privacy

        Have you tried taking a proctored test? The kind where you have to install proctoring software which takes 100% control of your PC, requires you keeping your webcam and mic open, show it around your room, stay in frame all the time, and not look away too many times in case the proctor fails you for potentially cheating from off-screen materials?

        The unforgivable invasion of privacy is already here, has been for a long time, and it didn’t come from Google.