Imo, better to allow it cautiously, with restrictions, and very explicitly mark code as AI generated when it is, than to have people submitting code secretly made by AI.
Furthermore, let’s be honest ‘AI’ regurgitates anything it “knows” about coding because of open source code. So take what you can get I guess. Just keep the quality up.
That’s the key. They want to mine and sell the data
Yeah cloudflare is too large.
This. Just leave it on your stove with oil / food in it til you’re ready to clean it. Then use soap water and a chainmail scrubber. Be as aggressive as you want. The smoother it is the better. If you have a cheap lodge, taking the time to actually use a sander will bring it to high quality smooth like a more expensive finex or other.
After cleaning toss back on the stove on the heat for like 1 min to dry it out and you’re good to go. Ideally toss a little oil in the pan after heating and use a paper towel to rub it around, but if you are in a rush don’t even have to do that.
All the things we didn’t ask for.
Yep. Will def pick it up once it’s done lol
Seems like there has to be a security vulnerability here. Ship bad extension. Update code to not be bad. Conditionally rollback based on remote server. Can pick who you attack conditionally and most people don’t have bad code running.
Amazing. Love it
So any game that needs anticheat is shit?
100% this. I really love these small indie games where you buy it. And… Surprise you actually own it. It works and it doesn’t need a weekly patch for the monthly season pass.
And then for some reason the devs actually love what they built and they keep giving updates which is amazing and an added bonus but far from expected and definitely not necessary because the game is already complete.
Heh that’s cool. For now ;)
Enshittification must march on. We will own nothing.
Yeah. I agree with this
Additionally, GamePasses are designed to force developers to have to use them. If enough people are using it, they’re going to be way more resistant to paying additional money for a game that isn’t in the game pass. This means that it locks users into a platform, and takes the consumers away from the game makers meaning the developers lose. Lose if they are on the game pass, lose if they aren’t.
Just another enshitification where the middleman is the only winner.
Yeah it’s bad for consumers which means more money for Nintendo (and publishers/devs) Reselling a physical game card nets 0 profit for either Nintendo nor the game publisher/dev. They really have 0 incentive to go out of their way to support it, sadly.
Sounds like a feature not a bug. Steal the content and take away the source of the content? Win win. Then the content can only be obtained via the AI.
They have literally 0 incentive to be good actors on the internet when being bad actors actually helps them since they’re effectively plagarizing the content.
Yeah this. You’re telling me this isn’t just an OSS project by some mel in their basement?
Well that’s pretty cool.
“Today, AI is the voice in the drive-thru that can’t hear our orders. It’s killing the livelihood of creative workers. It’s the thing you have to do at work, whether you like it or not. It’s making search engines unusable. It’s a justification for corporate layoffs. It’s plagiarism. It’s killing information access. It’s taking credit for the work of visual effects artists. It’s a serial liar. It’s harming our critical thinking and memory skills. It’s mecha-Hitler. It’s the really annoying popup. It’s wealth inequality. It’s a crutch for the loneliness epidemic. It’s the industrial polluter. It’s the scammer faking your voice for predatory phone calls. It’s the military-industrial complex. It’s the book that could kill you. It’s exploiting social media algorithms with fake content.”
If they depend exclusively on the Google safety net attestation service this is true. GrapheneOS supports even stronger attestation though, they just have to choose to implement it properly: https://grapheneos.org/articles/attestation-compatibility-guide
I like the article, but agree with so many of the comments here as well.
Ultimately I think one thing I’d love for would be a way to simply provide services (like Immich) for people but where the client is end to end encrypted, and neither the user nor the service has to worry about the how.
Example: how can I share an Immich with my family and friends, but where I don’t have access to any of their data. I.e. what signal does, but immich or any other service. I want to share my server with friends/family, but I don’t want access to any of their data. It isn’t a lack of trust, it’s that I don’t want that as even something they have to worry about
That same concept then extends here to community hosting. If we can solve the problem for a few, it should be scalable to many.
Right I feel like an ultra simple car / truck with no fancy features but an electric motor would actually being something to market that would sell. Eap when it should be $30k or less.