• ElectricTrombone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    47 minutes ago

    All three pins of that voltage regulator are shorted together. Not even sure how it’s possible to fuck up that badly.

  • buckykat [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    It is a pastiche of a circuit board, more than an actual board itself

    I told the pastiche making machine to make a thing and it made a pastiche of a thing instead shocked-pikachu

  • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    e.g. blind

    Why? Is looking at the damn thing before you pay money on manufacturing that hard?

    This baffles me about vibe coders too. You’re already saving a lot of time just look at the damn code and see if there’s any glaring mistakes.

    Why are we treating AI assistance like it’s all or nothing? Why can’t we just have it help a little and still use our own skills?

  • GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Thought something this stupid was just for shits and giggles. Then I saw this is LinkedIn and he’s a senior product manager.

    Haha the joke is on the rest of us

  • Scubus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Do this is ALMOST an actual thing. Seems like this guy tried to use an LLM to do something useful, lol. Meanwhile actual scientists are using actual AI to design actual conputer chips that actually perform better than their human competitors. That being said, the new chips are not “end-to-end” AI, theyre designed by AI and a human does the final touches. Theyre also highly unique, i cant find the article now but their AI designed a chip that seemed to use extra parts, i remember there was a diode and transistor that were literally completely seperated from the traces of the rest of the chip, and yet they were functional pieces and the chip wouldnt work if you removed them.

    • porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      i remember there was a diode and transistor that were literally completely seperated from the traces of the rest of the chip, and yet they were functional pieces and the chip wouldnt work if you removed them.

      If that was true they would be getting the Nobel in physics for discovering some incredible new quantum phenomena, it would be front-page news everywhere. I highly doubt it’s true.

      Frustratingly, that article you linked doesn’t actually link to the paper. But it is in Nature Communications. That’s a respectable journal but not that prestigious, and it publishes a lot of over hyped stuff. Not that any journal doesn’t. But if they had really found new physics with AI chip design that would go to Science, Nature, or maybe PRL.

      Edit: ah, I found it.

      https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-54178-1

      Chip design isn’t at all my specialty so take my opinion about this with a grain of salt. But I think it’s notable that

      Prior works in nanophotonics have demonstrated the class of inverse methods for specific dielectric-based passive structures through gradient based optimizations such as adjoint method

      So, there are already known algorithmic approaches to solving for these. I think it’s also notable that these are for signal transformation and antennae, relatively simple operations.

      This seems like a vaguely useful result but I don’t expect it’ll be breaking any new ground any time soon.

      • Scubus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Nah, it wasnt anything truly revolutionary. It was just some weird impedence effect we didnt fully understand how it was utilizing. AI doesnt really produce NEW stuff, but its really good at taking advantage of physics weve already worked out. Its not going to design a NEW chip, but it can pretty easily optimize existing chips or design a “new” layout that might be more efficient.

      • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Confidently incorrect about how fragile some circuits can be. Simple functionality is a convenient illusion we’ve beaten into various squiggles of metal. Electricity is secretly also a radio and a magnet, and even in wires it can’t know there’s nothing at the end until it gets there. Sometimes things just happen.

        • porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          They’re fabricating micrometer components with a 90 nm process. That’s pretty well in the classical regime. If they’re seeing substantial tunneling at that scale it would be rather noteworthy to say the least.

            • porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 hours ago

              A single diode a micrometer away from anything else is not suddenly a transformer without which a 400 um2 antenna stops working.

  • otacon239@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I can imagine the guy having to print this at the factory just pictures someone with schizophrenia making the board somewhere out there.