• ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Here’s a great idea: let’s not produce any weapons and disarm unilaterally. What could go wrong?

    • UnspecificGravity@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      The US could cut its arsenal by 90% and still have nothing to fear from anyone. That shit isn’t for defense it’s to threaten the rest of the world.

    • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      How about we split the difference and only cut two thirds of all military spending? We would still be pouring more money into it than any country on earth.

        • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          If we cut back that much, then we wouldn’t be able to fuel nearly as much death and destruction around the globe. But, not to worry, I’m sure we could still find enough evil to do to both satisfy your desire for blood and to earn the people responsible a cozy little spot in Hell, yes.

          • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            42 minutes ago

            Where did you get my desire for blood from? All I’m saying is that the same arms companies make weapons that fall in Gaza and that protect Europe. You can’t have one but not the other. It’s up to politicians to decide how to use those weapons, not engineers.

            • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              28 minutes ago

              It’s up to politicians to decide how to use those weapons, not engineers.

              Exactly how far does this extend? Because a lot of people involved in supporting the Nazi war effort said the exact same thing.

              If you go around solving every problem you’re asked to with no concern for who’s asking or why, that’s how you wind up developing Zyklon B.

              Giving a gun to a murderer is the same as pulling the trigger. Giving artillery to a murderer is too.