cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/5157579
This would push users toward local posts (especially on smaller instances) while still supporting a better distribution of user engagement over the threadiverse. And if you don’t trust that it was implemented correctly – you can simply check it by counting the amounts of posts against your chosen probabilities.
Edit: Changed feed’s name from explore to mixed
I don’t understand. Why would you want to push the user towards local posts?
Because of this: https://lemmy.world/post/5110170
That’s just junk pseudo pseudo science.
Well its not proven or anything that’s true. But until now no one convinced me otherwise.
until now no one convinced me otherwise.
That’s because it’s barely coherent.
It’s squarely in the “that’s not right, that’s not even wrong” territory.
Why?
For starters, because to give an answer to my straight forward question up top you send me to a rambling effort post.
Ok, I take that.
So the thing is: I don’t want to push users towards the Local-feed. That’s just what currently happening if you go to the front page. Local is selected as default. You can switch to All but often enough, I at least don’t do it.
Why is that? Because instances have less control of the All-feed, its often enough full of crap and the post of small instances will almost never appear in the All-feed. So they select Local as default and I, as a user, have to always switch between Local and All, which is annoying. I want to see whats going on on my instance but I also want to discover stuff from all over the threadiverse.
My solution is to combine the two into one feed, which simply picks posts from the respective feeds based on probabilities.
Thanks to @Spzi@lemm.ee for half of the idea
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
It’s not fair to say that something is a bad idea and not even say why. Could you please elaborate on why this is a bad idea? It is specifically toggleable -optional whatever. I think it’s a solid idea.
