I remember reading about these a little while ago. Supposedly toroidal propellers aren’t that good for high RPM and high speeds, but they’re really good for things like submarines and they also create no bubbles/sound. Another big benefit is they don’t harm wildlife such as manatees because they don’t have blades.
Yeah the benefits seem to be greater on the marine side…
But even then how much better they are is essentially unknown with an awful lot of drawbacks. They weigh more which is problematic for drones, are significantly more complex to manufacture and thus are more expensive.
So unless they can quantify how much better (and for those cons they need to be significantly better) I don’t see this gaining any traction.
The places I see them gaining traction are areas with manatees and wildlife that can be harmed by conventional propellers. If the local government enacts legislation that requires the use of them to protect wildlife for instance.
For now, they are prohibitively expensive due to the monopoly that Sharrow has with their patent. But there are other ways, such as jet ducts, to protect wildlife. But it’s not so easy to retrofit a jet into an existing boat.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@beehaw.org
Rumors, happenings, and innovations in the technology sphere. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
I remember reading about these a little while ago. Supposedly toroidal propellers aren’t that good for high RPM and high speeds, but they’re really good for things like submarines and they also create no bubbles/sound. Another big benefit is they don’t harm wildlife such as manatees because they don’t have blades.
Yeah the benefits seem to be greater on the marine side…
But even then how much better they are is essentially unknown with an awful lot of drawbacks. They weigh more which is problematic for drones, are significantly more complex to manufacture and thus are more expensive.
So unless they can quantify how much better (and for those cons they need to be significantly better) I don’t see this gaining any traction.
The places I see them gaining traction are areas with manatees and wildlife that can be harmed by conventional propellers. If the local government enacts legislation that requires the use of them to protect wildlife for instance.
For now, they are prohibitively expensive due to the monopoly that Sharrow has with their patent. But there are other ways, such as jet ducts, to protect wildlife. But it’s not so easy to retrofit a jet into an existing boat.